Merit as social mobility
The case for merit in education is, at bottom, a case about mobility. A school system rewards merit when a pupil's results depend on what she learns and does rather than on where she was born or what her parents earn. By that standard, the Italian system has long carried two structural handicaps: wide gaps between regions, and a strong link between the type of upper-secondary school a student attends and his later prospects.
The figures are stark. In PISA 2025, fifteen-year-olds in the North-West scored 492 in mathematics against 437 in the South. By track, students in licei averaged 501, those in technical institutes 449 and those in vocational institutes 386.[14] Italy's share of 25–34 year-olds with a tertiary degree was 31.1% in 2025, against an EU average of 44.8%.[17]
Seen through Article 34, these gaps are a measure of how far the constitutional promise remains unfulfilled. A ministry "of merit" that took the Constitution at its word would be judged less by the excellence of its best schools than by the distance between its strongest and its weakest.